JBERR Indexed In:
JBERR welcomes competent academicians to join us as reviewers. Being a reviewer is a matter of prestige and personnel achievement. JBERR follows a strict set of guidelines while accepting the applicant as a reviewer of JBERR. The minimum set of qualifications for being a reviewer of JBERR are listed below:
Should be a holder of PhD degree from a recognized university.
Should be an author with a minimum of a 5 publications in reputed journals.
Become a Reviewer
Manuscript reviewers are vital to the publication process, and as a reviewer you will gain valuable experience in scientific publishing. We invite you to become a reviewer of our journals.
Some benefits of being a peer reviewer:
Being a peer reviewer opens doors to incredible opportunities. Peer review services will enhance your knowledge of professional standards; and quickly earn the respect of your peers.
The other potential benefit of being a peer reviewer is that you will be preferred considered to be an editorial board member.
In order to provide a good review, a thoughtful and well-balanced report with suggested improvements for our authors, Reviewers must be prepared to invest the necessary time to evaluate the manuscript thoroughly.
The JBERR Journal follows COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. The following duties outlined for reviewers are based on the COPE Code of Conduct.
The Basic principles to which peer reviewers should adhere
Peer reviewers should:
only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner
respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process, beyond those that are released by the journal
not use information obtained during the peer-review process for their own or any other person’s or organization’s advantage, or to disadvantage or discredit others
declare all potential conflicting interests, seeking advice from the journal if they are unsure whether something constitutes a relevant interest
not allow their reviews to be influenced by the origins of a manuscript, by the nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender or other characteristics of the authors, or by commercial considerations
be objective and constructive in their reviews, refraining from being hostile or inflammatory and from making libellous or derogatory personal comments
acknowledge that peer review is largely a reciprocal endeavour and undertake to carry out their fair share of reviewing and in a timely manner
provide journals with personal and professional information that is accurate and a true representation of their expertise
recognize that impersonation of another individual during the review process is considered serious misconduct
Download COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
DIf you are interested in reviewing for our journal, please send your CV and scan copy of Reviewer agreement (duly signed by you) through email: email@example.com